Legal Opinion

DeAmiches v. Popczun

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1973No. 72-692PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

The ultimate question for resolution in this case is whether the trial court acted properly in granting defendant’s motion for judgment at the close of the plaintiffs’ opening statement.

Both the pleadings and the opening statement disclose the condition of the driveway, at the time in question, as being icy and covered with snow. They also carefully set forth the proposition that the cause of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff was the attempt on her part to go around a hole in the concrete driveway.

The remarks of plaintiffs ’ counsel in his opening statement are as follows:

“* * * ghe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Mikula v. TailorsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Porter v. Toledo Terminal Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. LaCourse v. FleitzOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Porter v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Jones v. White Motor Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Bowins v. Euclid General Hospital Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API