Clevenger v. Huling
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.
The court cannot agree with plaintiff’s suggestion that deféndant’s failure to observe the requirements of Sec*202tion 4511.29, Bevised Code, prohibiting driving to the left of center when overtaking and passing, combined with defendant’s claimed failure to observe the requirement of Section 4513.15, Bevised Code, requiring that his vehicular lights shall reveal “objects at a safe distance in advance of the vehicle,” require a finding that the defendant’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury, under the facts of this case. If, as alleged by the defendant in his answer…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davison v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ragone v. Vitali & Beltrami, Jr., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Dunn v. WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Schaffer v. DoneganOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dunn v. HigginsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Sabo v. HelselOhio Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.