Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Derwinski
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 16, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0073 (CRR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a former federal employee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is suing the defendant for discrimination in violation of Title VII. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this claim because it was filed more than thirty days after the plaintiff received the final agency decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c). Both parties agree that the plaintiff received notice of the final agency ruling of no discrimination on December 2,1989. Although the defendant argues…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Melvin W. Coles v. General Howard W. Penny, Director, Defense Mapping AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Hattie Paulk v. Department of the Air Force, Chanute Air Force BaseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Battle v. RubinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Strong-Fischer v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Redding v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Williams v. Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Kareem v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.