Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Wentz

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1915No. Civ. No. 1388PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ELLISON, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, a creditor of a corporation named “California Corporation,” brought an action against it to obtain judgment for a sum of money alleged to be due to him from said corporation. In said action a writ of attachment was issued and duly served upon the defendant herein by delivering to him a copy of said writ and a notice that all debts due and owing by him to said corporation were attached under said writ. Subsequently, on the sixteenth day of June, 1914, plaintiff obtained a judgment against said corporation for the sum of $3,921.00, upon which an execution was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hays v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Home State Bank v. SwartzMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Cate v. StapletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Weede v. Emma Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API