Gage v. Fisher
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Burleigh County; Winchester, J. Action by J. R. Gage against Asa Fisher. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.
We have reached the conclusion in this case that we must decide against the defendant and respondent, on his own theory. Taking the view of the facts which is most favorable to him, we are yet compelled to hold that he has neither any defense to the note sued on, nor any valid counterclaim against the plain*298tiff for money paid by him to plaintiff in part payment of such note. We will state our reasons for this conclusion as briefly as the complicated nature of the case will permit.
The action is on a promissory note for $3,000 given by defendant to plaintiff. The consideration for the note was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Guernsey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Woodruff v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Goodwin Gas Stove & Meter Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Frue v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Morel v. HogeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.