Frue v. Houghton
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, O. J.
This was a proceeding to enforce an agreement to transfer and deliver a number of shares of stock in the Sacramento Mining Company. The plaintiffs; below, Houghton and Curley, obtained a decree for the delivery of the shares of stock sued for, and to reverse this decree the defendants have sued out this writ of' error.
The first proposition laid down by counsel for plaintiffs; in error is, that a court of equity will not specifically enforce a contract relating to personal property.
That courts of equity have jurisdiction to decree the-specific performance of agreements, whether…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Perkins v. HadsellIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Wood v. CasserleighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- McMullin v. MagnusonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Corbett v. CronkhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.