Escondido Lumber, Hay & Grain Co. v. Baldwin
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Casius Carter, District Attorney, W. R. Andrews, Deputy District Attorney, and F. P. Willard, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Petition for writ of mandate. Findings and judgment in favor of petitioner, from which the respondent to the writ appeals.
From the record it appears that G. V. Thomas was on July 12, 1904, one of the trustees of the Escondido school district, and at the same time was a stockholder in and director and general manager of the plaintiff corporation; that on said date the school district entered into a contract with one S. M. Stewart to construct a schoolhouse for the sum of $750; that Stewart was at the time solvent and with means to pay for the materials necessary for use in such house otherwise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Casserleigh v. WoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. DeysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- City Council v. McKinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.