Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. USAA Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2011No. 1861 WDA 2009PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.:

William F. Rhodes, Jr. and Carrie E. Rhodes (“the Rhodeses”) appeal from the order of August 31, 2009, granting, in part, appellee USAA Casualty Insurance Company’s (“USAA”) motion to compel. We reverse.

The relevant facts and procedural history underlying this appeal are, in abbreviated form, as follows. On July 1, 2000, while Mr. Rhodes was driving his brother’s motorcycle, he was involved in an accident, from which he suffered numerous injuries sufficiently serious as to require hospitalization in an intensive care unit for several days. The Rhodes-es filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Condio v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Dougherty v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Mohney v. American General Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC v. Clean Air CouncilCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. McIlmail, D. v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API