Legal Opinion

Valz v. Goodykoontz

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Amherst county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The judgment under review was rendered for the defendant in error (the plaintiff below) on a demurrer to the evidence by the defendant.

The following are the essential facts of the case as thus submitted: The defendant, Valz, was a railroad contractor in the employment of the Western State Hospital, engaged in grading a spur track from the Norfolk and Western Railway, at a point about one mile east of Lynchburg, to the power house of the Virginia State Epileptic Colony in Amherst county. At the time of the accident the defendant, in the course of his work, had caused a large quantity of rock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lane Bros. & Co. v. BausermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  2. Walton, Witten & Graham v. Miller's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Low Moor Iron Co. v. La Bianca's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  4. Lane Bros. v. SeakfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  5. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Daily's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Independent - Eastern Torpedo Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Curry v. Journal Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Heldenfels v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Texas Tunneling Company v. City of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API