Legal Opinion

Lane Bros. v. Seakford

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 22, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Albemarle county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

W. L. Seakford brought this action to recover of Lane Bros. Co. damages for injuries received by him, which it is alleged were occasioned the plaintiff by the negligence of the defendant. A verdict was returned for the plaintiff, which the Circuit Court refused to set aside. To the judgment rendered upon that verdict this writ of error was awarded upon the petition of Lane Bros. Co.

A demurrer to the declaration and each count thereof was overruled. This action of the court is assigned as error.

The purpose of a declaration is to inform the. defendant of the nature of the demand made upon him.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Slater v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Bertha Zinc Co. v. Martin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Hortenstein v. Virginia-Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Wood v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont, etc., Co. v. Snead's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Blackwood Coal & Coke Co. v. James' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  3. Lynchburg Traction & Light Co. v. GuillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. NewtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  5. Powhatan Lime Co. v. Whetzel's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API