Lane Bros. & Co. v. Bauserman
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Shenandoah county, in an action 'of trespass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
John W. Bauserman instituted his action of trespass on the case-against John E. Lane and others, doing business as partners under the firm name of Lane Brothers & Co., to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him while working in the defendants’ rock quarry, and alleged to have been caused by their negligence.
*149Upon the calling of the cause, the defendants appeared and moved the court to quash the writ or summons. This motion was overruled and the defendants excepted. This action of the court is assigned as error.
The bill of exception states that the grounds of the motion were,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New River Mineral Co. v. PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Richmond Locomotive Works v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Norfolk & Western R. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Russell Creek Coal Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Harvey v. SkipwithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. BradyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Kiser v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Aronovitch v. AyresSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Southern Sand & Gravel Co. v. Massaponax Sand & Gravel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Moore v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.