National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The Petitioner seeks enforcement of an order which it issued against the Respondent (hereinafter “Pacific”). 1 The order is based upon a finding by the Board that Pacific violated sections 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1), (5), by refusing to bargain with the Union. 2 The sole issue is whether the Board’s certification of the Union is invalid because the Board erred in concluding, over Pacific’s objections and without a hearing, that a part-time employee of the Respondent, one Christensen, was qualified to vote at the representation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Staiman BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Bell Foundry Company, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Bell Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Valley Rock Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Pollen v. Aware, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of ModestoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.