Legal Opinion
United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Bell Foundry Company, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Bell Foundry Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1980No. 78-2083, 78-2315PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
On November 30,1977, Bell Foundry (the employer) mailed discharge notices to four striking employees. This occurred several months after the expiration of Bell’s, previous Collective Bargaining Agreement with United Steelworkers (the union) and shortly before a new agreement was signed. The union instituted this action to compel arbi*140tration of the discharges. The district court held that the discharges were not arbitrable under the new contract, and only that portion of the judgment is now at issue.1 We reverse because at the time the discharges became effective the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lozano Enterprises v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Travis v. Nederland Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- F. W. Means & Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Sunshine Dairy, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki's Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Heheman v. E. W. Scripps Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. GilliamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. GilliamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Bedford AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.