Legal Opinion

Pollen v. Aware, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 15, 2002No. 99-P-1459PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

After a bench trial in the Superior Court, judgment was entered for the plaintiff, William David Pollen, on his *824claims against the defendant, Aware, Inc. (Aware), for breaches of contract and of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, in connection with Aware’s refusal to permit Pollen to exercise certain stock options it had previously granted to bim. On appeal, Aware claims that the trial judge committed various errors both in his determination of liability and in his calculation of damages. We vacate the judgment on the count of the complaint alleging breach of the implied duty of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Development, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Kendall v. SelvaggioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Cort v. Bristol-Myers Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mark Boyce v. Soundview Technology Group, Inc. (Formerly Known as Wit Capital Group, Inc.), Docket No. 05-1685-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Kaminsky v. HerrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003
  4. Crawford-Brunt v. KruskallDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  5. Tomer v. Hollister Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API