Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of Modesto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1976No. 74--2636PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*939OPINION
Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT,* District Judge. PER CURIAM.
The reasons for the Board’s order are briefly but adequately stated in its decisions in this unfair labor practice proceeding (210 NLRB No. 117) and the underlying representation proceeding. They have support in the record and reflect a reasonable interpretation of the statute. See NLRB v. Staiman Bros., 466 F.2d 564, 566 (3rd Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co., 438 F.2d 112, 113 (9th Cir. 1971); Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 903, 908 (6th Cir. 1968); Trailmobile…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Staiman BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Medical Hospital of Modesto, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital of ModestoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976