Legal Opinion
Bruns v. Mattocks
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 13, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
6 N.J. Super. 174 (1950)
70 A.2d 780
ELIZABETH BRUNS, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT,
v.
ROSAMOND MATTOCKS AND MARY C. RITTENBUSCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATORS WITH THE WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK W. MATTOCKS, DECEASED, DEFENDANTS, AND MINNIE SELVIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 3, 1950.
Decided January 13, 1950.
Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.
Mr. George F. Losche argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Harold Kolovsky argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Platoff & Platoff, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Forstman v. . SchultingNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Pincus v. PincusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Kristeller v. First Nat. Bank, Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berger v. Dixon & Snow, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Excel Corp. v. JimenezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Bernoskie v. ZarinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Excel Corp. v. JimenezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000