Legal Opinion

Excel Corp. v. Jimenez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 2, 2000No. 81,251PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the was court delivered by

Six, J.:

This summary judgment case concerns an employer’s claim against an attorney for return of a 25 per cent contingent attorney fee arising from a fraudulent workers compensation award.

Plaintiff Excel Corporation filed a K.S.A. 44-5,120 et seq. “fraud and abuse” civil action. The district court ordered the defendant attorney, Henry Goertz, to return the fee. Goertz appeals.

The Kansas Trial Lawyers Association filed an amicus brief in support of Goertz.

Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 20-3018(c) (a transfer from the Court of Appeals on our own…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Pocius v. HalvorsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lightner v. Centennial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. PraegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Ehsani v. McCullough Family PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lowe v. ExperianDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  4. Ehsani v. McCullough Family PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cox v. CoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API