Legal Opinion

Zirpola v. Adam Hat Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 6, 1939PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hetfield, J.

This action was instituted in the Supreme Court for the breach of an implied warranty arising out of the provision of section 15 of the Sale of Goods act, Pamph. L. 1907, p. 316; R. S. 46:30-21, subdivision (1) of which provides: “Where the buyer, expressly or by implication, makes known to the seller the particular purpose for which the goods are required, and it appears that the buyer relies on the seller’s skill or judgment (whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not), there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be reasonably…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Nina Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, a Corporation and Waval Thermal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. BradenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Ringstad v. I. Magnin & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Crotty v. Shartenberg's-New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API