Legal Opinion

Theodore D. Buhl, and Anastasia R. Buhl, His Wife v. A. M. Menninger, Director of Internal Revenue, Detroit, Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1958No. 13280PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants filed an action against the District Director of Internal Revenue, claiming that his denial of their petition for refund of taxes theretofore illegally paid to his predecessor in office was arbitrary and capricious. Upon the dismissal of their complaint by the district court, they appealed.

The District Director’s predecessor, who collected the taxes, had died before the suit was commenced.

In Sage v. United States, 250 U.S. 33, 39 S.Ct. 415, 63 L.Ed. 828, it was held that a suit against a Collector is personal; and that, at the time judgment is entered, the United States is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur Wolinsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. The First National Bank of South Carolina of Columbia v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  3. Independent Fish Company v. PhinneyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1966
  4. Stewart v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  5. Hoffman v. MachizDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API