Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Fox

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 11, 1959No. Civ. No. 9143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Defendant has moved to dismiss this action for return of alleged overpayment of income taxes because (1) taxpayer did not file timely claims for refund, and (2) the alleged overpayment was not made to defendant (the present district director) but to the collector who was in office in *358,1949 and 1950. At the hearing counsel offered and referred to several exhibits and admissions; the motion will therefore be treated as a motion for summary-judgment.

Plaintiff filed timely income tax returns for the years 1943 to 1947 and paid the taxes shown thereby. After audit, additional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Garbutt Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  5. Phoenix State Bank & Trust Co. v. BitgoodDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman v. MachizDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API