Legal Opinion

Arthur Wolinsky v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 26, 1959No. 292, Docket 25447PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover manufacturer’s excise taxes alleged to have been erroneously paid. Taxpayer-appellee manufactures and installs custom made automobile seat covers. The disputed taxes were paid during the three years 1948 through 1950. Appellee contends that at the time these taxes were paid a portion of his business was not subject to taxation. The court below agreed with taxpayer’s contentions and rendered judgment against the United States. We conclude that the disputed taxes were lawfully collected and reverse the result reached below.

Appellee’s sales…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. The Lesavoy Foundation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Hammond-Knowlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. International Business MacHines Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Stevens Bros. Foundation, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Laura Massaglia v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  5. Edwin O. Bookwalter v. Joseph H. And Frances R. BreckleinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API