Independent Fish Company v. Phinney
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SPEARS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs filed these actions asserting a claim for refund of federal unemployment taxes erroneously paid. The defendant now moves the Court to transfer these actions to the Brownsville Division of the Southern District of Texas, citing in support thereof Sections 1391 (e) and 1404(a) of Title 28, United States Code. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, the defendant’s motion is granted.
Section 1404(a) of Title 28, United States Code, provides that:
“(f) or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Theodore D. Buhl, and Anastasia R. Buhl, His Wife v. A. M. Menninger, Director of Internal Revenue, Detroit, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Farnsworth & Chambers Company, Inc. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Cotter v. LuckenbillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Enviroglas Products, Inc. v. Enviroglas Products, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Wolf Designs, Inc. v. Donald McEvoy Ltd., Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005