Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co. v. Federal Holding Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1924No. 24,161PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injuction and discharging a restraining order.
The Minneapolis Electric Lamp Company is a corporation and the other plaintiffs are its officers. The Federal Holding Company is a corporation and the other defendant is its president. We will herein refer to plaintiff corporation as lessee and defendant corporation as lessor. Lessor made a lease with lessee for the full term of two years beginning January 1, 1921, at an annual rental of $2,100 payable monthly. The lease contains a printed provision to the effect that if…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steffes v. Motion Picture Machine Operators UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Roraback v. Motion Picture Machine Operators UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- George J. Grant Construction Co. v. St. Paul Building Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Ekeberg v. MackaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Borough of Belle Plaine v. Northern Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thermorama, Inc. v. BuckwoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Williams v. RolfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Johnson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Seward v. SchrieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Schmidt v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.