Roraback v. Motion Picture Machine Operators Union
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Motion Picture Machine Operators Union of Minneapolis, Local 219,'International Alliance of Theatrical State Employees of the United States and Canada, an unincorporated association, the officers and members thereof, also Trades and Labor Assembly of -Minneapolis and Hennepin county, an unincorporated association composed of delegates from the various unions of the building trades and other labor union societies, and…
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Motion Picture Machine Operators Union of Minneapolis, Local 219,'International Alliance of Theatrical State Employees of the United States and Canada, an unincorporated association, the officers and members thereof, also Trades and Labor Assembly of -Minneapolis and Hennepin county, an unincorporated association composed of delegates from the various unions of the building trades and other labor union societies, and the officers and delegates to such assembly, to recover $1,200 damages and to enjoin defendants and their respective…
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The defendants are the Motion Picture Machine Operators Union of Minneapolis, known as Local_ 219, and composed of motion picture machine operators; the Trades and Labor Assembly of Minneapolis composed of representatives from a large number of labor unions of Minneapolis of which Local 219 is one; and a large number of individuals who are officers or members of one or the other, or both, of these associations.
*483Plaintiff has operated a motion picture theatre, known first as the Orient and. later as the New National Theatre, in the city of Minneapolis from May 1, 1916, until the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Willner v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Green v. Victor Talking MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Greenfield v. Central Labor CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1920
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.