Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Gould
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1927No. 25,995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, O. J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an order discharging an order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not be issued during the pendency of the action.
The action was instituted to restrain the defendant from enforcing an order made by him pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 5630, to reserve all the wraters of Rainy Lake within the confines of the county of Koochiching for fish propagation. Plaintiffs are local commercial fishermen.
A temporary injunction will not be granted unless it clearly appears that there is an immediate prospect that plaintiffs would otherwise suffer an irreparable…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- State ex rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Cooper, Myers & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Nelson v. DelongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Remington Arms Co. v. G. E. M. of St. Louis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Independent School District No. 35 v. EngelstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.