Warmack v. Merchants Nat. Bank of Fort Smith
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The questions raised in this appeal concern a lease provision which provides that the tenant cannot sublet the premises without the landlord’s permission. The chancellor held that Arkansas law implies that consent to sublet cannot be unreasonably withheld and that the landlord so acted in this case. We disagree and reverse the decree.
The parties are the landlord-owner of the Central Mall, a large shopping complex in Fort Smith, and the tenant-Merchants National Bank of Fort Smith. A detailed and lengthy lease agreement was signed by the parties in 1969. Under this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Homa-Goff Interiors, Inc. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Arrington v. Walter E. Heller International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Mitchell's, Inc. v. NelmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Granite Trust Bldg. Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Littlejohn v. ParrishOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Julian v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.