Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Higgins v. City of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

We do not understand that there is any claim to a right to locate a tavern anywhere within a municipality regardless of the effect such an institution may have upon the interests of the community. It is understood and generally conceded that the business of conducting a tavern is subject to legislative restriction, regulation, and control. Usually there is vested in the licensing authorities a discretionary power which may be reasonably exercised in granting or refusing to issue a license.

That an ordinance or statute provides for granting licenses to applicants furnishing a proper bond and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lerner v. City of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Harrison v. People ex rel. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bernstein v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Smyth v. ButtersUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Wadhams Oil Co. v. City of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council of the City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Weiss v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ex parte VelascoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Smith v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Rawn v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API