Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Whitewater

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRector, J.

Is it permissible under sec. 176.05 (21), Stats., to issue fourteen retail Class B intoxicating liquor licenses in the city of Whitewater ?

The subsection reads:

“(a) No governing body of any town, village or city shall issue more than one retail ‘Class B’ liquor license for each five hundred inhabitants or fraction thereof, except that if a greater number of such licenses have been granted, issued, or in force, in such town, village or city, at the time of the taking effect of this subsection, than would be permissible under said limitation, such town board, village board or common council may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Smith v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State ex rel. Higgins v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Rawn v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Johnson v. Town Board of WyocenaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council of the City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Town of Germantown v. Village of GermantownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Marquette Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Village of Twin LakesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API