Legal Opinion

Rawn v. City of Superior

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Two questions are involved:(1) Is the common council of a city under a duty to grant an applicant a license where it appears that he has complied with the requirements of the law and no objection has been made to his personal fitness or the place of business ?(2) Is sec. 176.05 (8), Stats., mandatory in the sense that if the common council does not act upon an application for a license prior to the 15th day of June, it may not thereafter deny the license ?

The material facts as found by the court are as follows: The plaintiff filed his application for a retail Class B intoxicating liquor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Higgins v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Johnson v. Town Board of WyocenaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bjordal v. Town BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council of the City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Thomas D. Nowell v. City of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Smith v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Boroo v. Town Board of BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Edge v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API