Legal Opinion

Woo v. Martz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1952No. Civ. 18824PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This action was instituted to enforce an asserted easement for the discharge of storm waters over appellants’ lands adjacent to the tract held under lease by respondents and for damages to the latter resulting from loss of crops that perished under the waters diverted by appellants from their established course.

In 1942 respondents Woo leased from one Raymond Hails about 51 acres of agricultural lands in the Dominguez Colony Tract in Los Angeles County. The lands were promptly planted to garden truck which by January, 1943, attained commercial maturity with a value of $6,100. The following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. O'Hara v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Nelson v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Woo v. MartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barclay Kitchen, Inc. v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Case v. UridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Baker v. HansenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API