Legal Opinion

Woo v. Martz

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1946No. L. A. No. 19319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is a companion case to Hails'v. Marts, ante, p. 775 [172 P.2d 52], this :day- decided.

In the present action plaintiffs who are lessees of R. H. Hails (plaintiff in the companion case) sought damages for injury to their crops caused by the alleged wrongful acts of defendants Martz in closing up-a ditch on their land through which surface waters had formerly been diverted frtim the lands leased by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying them relief and awarding damages against them under a cross-complaint which alleged that plaintiffs'had wrongfully diverted the surface…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hails v. MartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woo v. MartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API