Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1941No. Civ. 6363PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TPIE COURT.
This action was brought to quiet title to the lands of appellants; to recover damages for injury done to said property; and to abate a nuisance. The trial court found for respondents upon all issues, and the following judgment was entered:
“That the ownership and possession of the plaintiffs to the above described property is subject to the prescriptive right of defendants to permit waters to percolate, flow and seep from the ditch of defendants described in said second amended complaint under, in and upon the hereinbefore de scribed lands of plaintiffs to the same extent and in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Parker v. LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Kall v. CarruthersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Massetti v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Avner v. Longridge EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Young v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.