Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.M.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 2002No. 2-01-100-CVPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*236OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict, terminating parental rights. The judgment terminated the parental rights of Appellant Marium M. and her husband James M. as to three of their children, J.M.M., B.R.M., and W.T.M. Marium was the only parent to appear at trial and is the only parent appealing. In ten issues, Marium complains of the submission of two jury instructions regarding alternative means of endangerment of her children, no evidence to support termination on any of four grounds submitted, legal and factual…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. in the Interest of M.R.J.M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  5. Harris County v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2002

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API