Legal Opinion

In Re Moses

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 5, 2003No. 19-20417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DENYING DAIMLER-CHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA L.L.C.’S OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION

PHILLIP J. SHEFFERLY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Introduction

The Debtor filed a chapter 13 petition on February 5, 2003. Secured creditor Daim-lerChrysler filed an objection to confirmation based on its being denied adequate protection post-confirmation, due to a delay in receiving distributions under the plan. DaimlerChrysler asserts that this delay can easily be remedied by the Debt- or’s counsel receiving his attorney fees in installments. The Debtor counters that adequate protection is not applicable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. In Re CookUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1997
  4. In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  5. In Re DewsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. In Re BalderasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2005
  3. In Re WillisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  4. In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API