Legal Opinion

In Re Parker

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 16, 1981No. Bankruptcy 1-81-01776PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RALPH H. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtors filed a chapter 13 case under the Bankruptcy Code. In their plan the debtors proposed to pay all claims “in full”.

One creditor, Credithrift of America, Inc., objected to confirmation of the debtors’ plan. The creditor’s main objection is that the plan does not provide exactly how the trustee will make payments, especially with regard to payment of the debtors’ attorney’s fee.

Credithrift also argued that the debtors’ attorney must file a proof of claim in order to be paid his fee through the chapter 13 plan.

The latter argument can be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Lewis (In Re Lewis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1981
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lum (In Re Lum)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
  3. Flushing Savings Bank v. Parr (In Re Parr)District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  4. Paccar Financial Corp. v. Brock (In Re Brock)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. In Re SchnabelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. In re Chicago Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re PerezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  5. In Re Walter Johnson Dba Johnson Star Route, Debtor. United States of America v. Richard B. Ginley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API