Legal Opinion

DiGregorio v. Keystone Health Plan East

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2003PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we examine the coordinate jurisdiction rule. Nello and Vincenza DiGregorio, individually and doing business as DiGregorio Trucking Company (“Appellants”), appeal from an order entering judgment in favor of Appellee, Keystone Health Plan East (“Keystone”), due to Appellants’ failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.

¶ 2 On April 1, 1999, Mrs. DiGregorio was treated at Warminster Hospital for possible heart trauma. As a result of her treatment, Appellants incurred $9,785 in hospital charges. Appellants submitted the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Zane v. Friends HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hilbert v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. In re Activision Blizzard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. Genuardfs Family Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Wexler v. HechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Nordi v. Keystone Health Plan West Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Egan v. USI Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API