Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. New v. Rumsfeld
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 22, 2004No. CIV.A.96-0033(PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The petitioner in this case, Specialist Michael G. New, is an enlisted member of the United States Army convicted by court-martial of disobeying a lawful order under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and sentenced to a bad conduct discharge. Mr. New has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, asking the Court to set aside his conviction based on the invalidity of the order he was convicted of disobeying, and the improper submission of that order’s lawfulness to the military judge rather than to the court-martial panel.
Respondents,…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Feld Entertainment, Inc. v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Khadr v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- U.S. ex rel New, M. v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Smith v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Sanford v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.