Legal Opinion
in the Interest of M.A.N.M., a Child
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided February 6, 2002No. 04-01-00295-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
The trial court terminated John Ramirez’s parental rights to M.A.N.M. Ramirez appeals the judgment in three issues. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Anthony Medina and Tammy Sells were married at the time of trial. When they married, Sells was pregnant; Medina, however, is not the biological father of the child. John Ramirez is the child’s biological father. M.A.N.M. was born in January of 1999 with cocaine in her system. Medina knew Sells was using drugs and drinking heavily, at times, during her pregnancy. Child…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- In the Interest of G. M.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Dupree v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- In the Interest of D.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In the Interest of C.Z.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- In the Interest of C.N.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In the Interest of J.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- in the Interest of J.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- Clarence D. Brown v. Lubbock County Commissioner's Court, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.