Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 2001No. 2-00-176-CVPublishedCited by 401 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDNER, Justice.

Appellant W.M. appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her children, D.M., B.W., and J.C.W. In three issues, she contends there is legally and factually insufficient evidence to support the judgment of termination. We conclude the evidence is both legally and factually sufficient to support the judgment rendered and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

*806Background Facts

Appellant is the mother of three children: D.M., who was born in 1988; B.W., who was born in 1994; and J.C.W., who was born in 1996. The Texas Department of Protective and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by401 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  3. in the Interest of M.R.J.M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  4. in the Interest of M.R. and W.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  5. in the Interest of W.E.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API