Pena v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, WOMACK, and HERVEY, JJ., joined.
Jose Luis Pena objected to the admission of lab test results because the State destroyed the substance tested before trial. He objected under the Texas Constitution’s due course of law provision but failed to argue, before the trial judge, that it is more protective than the federal Due Process Clause. The lower court held that Pena’s Texas constitutional claim was preserved and reversed on that ground.1 We hold that it was not and reverse the court’s judgment.
Background
Pena was charged with possession of marijuana that was…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Reyna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by508 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Pena, Jose LuisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Lovill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Golliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Jose Marvin Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
503 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.