Harris v. Rivard
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rummel, J. †
The plaintiffs, who are appellants here, seek specific performance of an earnest money agreement wherein they are purchasers, and the defendants, respondents here, are sellers. The only issue necessary to consider on this appeal is whether the defendant husband was mentally competent to enter into the agreement.
Although mental incompetency was pleaded as a defense, the plaintiffs proceeded in their case to present testimony concerning this issue by calling the defendants’ doctor and a nurse who helped to care for the husband in a nursing home where he was confined on the date of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Page v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Universal Grand LodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grannum v. BerardWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Ormiston v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Dix Steel Co. v. Miles Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Hayward v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Peterson v. EritslandWashington Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.