Peterson v. Eritsland
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Plaintiff (respondent) initiated this action against defendants (appellants), husband and wife, to enforce two contracts for the support of two illegitimate children. The trial court sustained the contracts and ordered payments in accord therewith. Defendants appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In September, 1957, appellant Oscar Bernard Eritsland, a medical doctor, arrived in Seattle, Washington, to commence residency in a local hospital and establish a practice. His wife, appellant Amelia E. Eritsland, was to and did join him in the early part of October. In the interval, he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Page v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Whiting v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Harris v. RivardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grannum v. BerardWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Kinne v. KinneWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Poweroil Manufacturing Co. v. CarstensenWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Wood v. DunlopCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.