Legal Opinion

People v. Becker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1934No. Docket No. 2459PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of “issuing bank check, with intent to defraud”, as denounced by the provisions of section 476a of the Penal Code, as well as from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied.

Essentially, the facts upon which the conviction of defendant depended were that on a certain Saturday afternoon, in payment of the price of a watch which he had purchased, defendant issued a check on a bank in which he had neither funds, an account, nor credit. In his defense, in effect, defendant testified that prior to issuing the check he had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. LandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. People v. BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. GeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API