Legal Opinion
State v. Kisselburg
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1925No. Civil No. 2275PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— On October 25, 1922, M. Kissel-burg and C. T. Schmidt, copartners, as Kisselburg & Schmidt, hereinafter called plaintiffs, entered into a contract through the then state engineer, Thomas Maddock, with the state of Arizona, for certain work on the Yuma-Phoenix highway, federal aid project No. 55.
A dispute arose during the course of construction of the road, over the amount due plaintiffs from the state for certain surfacing done under the contract. Plaintiff brought suit against the state of Arizona, referred to hereinafter as defendant, and obtained judgment in the sum of $16,852.76 with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Greenlee County v. CoteyArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Mitchell v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kunian v. Development Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Terminal Const. Corp. v. Bergen, Etc., AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943