Legal Opinion

Terminal Const. Corp. v. Bergen, Etc., Authority

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 12, 1954PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 N.J. Super. 478 (1954)

112 A.2d 762

TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

BERGEN COUNTY HACKENSACK RIVER SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE, NOW KNOWN AS BERGEN COUNTY SEWER AUTHORITY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 15, 1954.

Decided May 12, 1954.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Aaron Heller argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Heller & Laiks, attorneys).

Mr. Walter Jones…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Benjamin Foster Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Attorney General v. Algonquin ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moorestown Mgmt. v. MOORESTOWN BOOKSHOPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Doyle v. Northrop Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  4. Saul v. Midlantic Nat. Bank/SouthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Wilson Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API