Legal Opinion

Harris v. Foster

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1893No. 19104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. ¡ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

On March 12, 1888, L. D. Stone and his daughter, Harriet, each owned an undivided half of the Sisquoc rancho, in Santa Barbara County. Upon that day the father mortgaged his interest therein to the plaintiff in this action. In January, 1890, the plaintiff commenced an action to foreclose this mortgage, and at the same time filed and recorded a notice of the pendency thereof. Stone was thereafter declared insolvent, and one Bush was appointed his assignee, and as such was made a party to the foreclosure suit. Judgment of foreclosure was entered in that action September 1,1890, and two days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greenebaum Sons Bank & Trust Co. v. KingsburyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  2. Lawer v. MittsWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. United States Mortgage Co. v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Fowler v. Lane Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Munzinger v. CaffreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API