Legal Opinion

Munzinger v. Caffrey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1942No. Civ. 2952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and appellant instituted this action against defendants and respondents Harry Caffrey, John W„ McMurray, Roland McMurray and Ray McMurray, for declaratory relief and for money claimed to be due under the terms of a lease wherein appellant, on May 19, 1934, leased to respondent Harry Caffrey lot 4, block 12, in Bishop, together with certain card and pool tables, bar and fixtures, candy and cigar cases, and other furnishings and fixtures located in the building on that property. The lease was for a term of five years with a monthly rental of $125. At the time the lease to Caffrey was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Treff v. GulkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API