Legal Opinion
State v. Sparkling
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 2011No. WD 73737PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to section 547.200.1(3),1 the State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri (“trial court”), granting Clifton S. Sparkling’s (“Sparkling”) motion to suppress statements. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background2
On June 16, 2010, Barret Wolters, a detective with the Jefferson City Police *48Department, met with Sparkling, at Sparkling’s request, at the Jefferson City Police Department. Sparkling had been arrested and was in custody. The interview lasted almost two hours and was recorded…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. GanzorigMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. MignoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Missouri v. Jeffrey J. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. PenningtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.