Meacham v. Ballard Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
Our former opinion shows generally the relation of Mr. Clark R. Fletcher to this case. He was not formally a party to that appeal, but has since appealed from the judgment. We have allowed a reargument of the issues passed upon in our former opinion so as to reconsider the whole case on Mr. Fletcher's appeal. The original lien claimant and respondent, A. Enkema, having departed this life in the meantime, Mrs. Nellie Enkema, the executrix of his estate, has been substituted in his stead as lien claimant and respondent.
4. In our former opinion we declined to pass upon the question whether an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lawler v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Jackson v. CloptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Charest v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Smith v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Cunningham v. Sizer Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meacham v. Ballard Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931