Legal Opinion

Meacham v. Ballard Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1931No. Nos. 28,487, 29,488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 240 N.W. 540. This action comes here again (see 180 Minn. 30,230 N.W. 113) on no issue between the parties. It was settled by defendants for $30,000 paid to George S. Grimes, one of plaintiff's attorneys. Thereafter A. Enkema, claiming to be one of counsel for plaintiff, asserted a lien. The resulting issues arise solely between Enkema and Grimes. The decision below sustained the contentions of Mr. Enkema. The appeal from the resulting judgment is in the names of both plaintiff and defendants but is prosecuted on behalf of Mr. Grimes. Other attorneys may be interested with him,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Langdon v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Weinstein v. SeidmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Meacham v. Ballard & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Kennedy v. CarrickAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API